From: Robert Jördens (rjo-lists_at_gmx.de)
Date: 08/03/03 09:11 EDT
Message-ID: <3F2D09FD.6080202@gmx.de> From: Robert Jördens <rjo-lists@gmx.de> Subject: Re: [ardour-dev] // someone's been busy.. // Date: Sun, 03 Aug 2003 14:11:25 +0100 delire wrote: > it may be that my dual p4 is tainting an objective impression but > performance in both the track management and UI seem to have *radically* > improved. i'm dumping huge numbers of tracks, bashing away at the UI > with all i've got and so far no segfaults. i mastered my last release, > an experimental record, in Ardour six months ago and we sure had our bad > days. > > the 0.9bate2-3 is fscken quick, and undoubtedly compares to PT and Cool > Edit which have been my performance benchmarks [albeit on a broken OS]. 0.9beta2-3 seems like the Debian package. That versions is build _without_ --enable-optimize. Current versions 0.9beta2-4 upwards are optimized (on i386). BTW: Anyone tried ardour on ppc or other architectures yet? Debian packages are ready. I'll post the patch for atomic.h and cycles.h as soon as I know that it works. Robert. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 _______________________________________________ ardour-dev mailing list ardour-dev@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ardour-dev
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : 08/03/03 10:16 EDT