From: delire (delire_at_selectparks.net)
Date: 08/03/03 11:07 EDT
From: delire <delire@selectparks.net> Subject: Re: [ardour-dev] // someone's been busy.. // Message-Id: <20030804010705.2f67cbe5.delire@selectparks.net> Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2003 01:07:05 +1000 oh well, it can only improve in performance then, not that i can see where it could improve at this rate. again, maybe it is more noticeable on lower spec machines. delire On Sun, 03 Aug 2003 14:11:25 +0100 Robert Jördens <rjo-lists@gmx.de> wrote: //delire wrote: // //> it may be that my dual p4 is tainting an objective impression but //> performance in both the track management and UI seem to have *radically* //> improved. i'm dumping huge numbers of tracks, bashing away at the UI //> with all i've got and so far no segfaults. i mastered my last release, //> an experimental record, in Ardour six months ago and we sure had our bad //> days. //> //> the 0.9bate2-3 is fscken quick, and undoubtedly compares to PT and Cool //> Edit which have been my performance benchmarks [albeit on a broken OS]. // //0.9beta2-3 seems like the Debian package. That versions is build _without_ //--enable-optimize. Current versions 0.9beta2-4 upwards are optimized (on i386). // //BTW: Anyone tried ardour on ppc or other architectures yet? Debian packages //are ready. // //I'll post the patch for atomic.h and cycles.h as soon as I know that it works. // // Robert. // // // ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 _______________________________________________ ardour-dev mailing list ardour-dev@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ardour-dev
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : 08/03/03 11:22 EDT