From: D R Holsbeck (drh_at_niptron.com)
Date: 01/05/03 10:49 EST
Subject: Re: [ardour-dev] latest CVS commit From: D R Holsbeck <drh@niptron.com> Message-Id: <1041781790.656.4.camel@tpdrh.niptron.com> Date: 05 Jan 2003 09:49:51 -0600 I vote for cdrecord, only because thats what I use ;-) I have never had any issues with it. Its never turned out any coasters, and seems rock stable. On Sun, 2003-01-05 at 09:52, Paul Davis wrote: > >> oops. now that i've made the change, i remember why i designed it this > >> way. direct-to-cd ... hmm. oh well. its easier to understand right > >> now, and thus may prove easier to extend to a system where we > >> integrate with cdrecord(3). > > > >Have you decided to prefer cdrecord over cdrdao or is it undecided yet? > > undecided. i'm willing to hear arguments for either. my impression is > that cdrecord is more mature, best tested and handles more hardware > quirkiness that cdrdao. > > --p > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > ardour-dev mailing list > ardour-dev@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ardour-dev -- drh@niptron.com Kites rise highest against the wind -- not with it. -- Winston Churchill ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ ardour-dev mailing list ardour-dev@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ardour-dev
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : 01/05/03 10:55 EST