> > RAID 0 for instance is the opposite, it uses striping, and is strictly > used for performance and space. In this scenario there is no redundancy > at all, and the avialable space become s * N. Performance is increased > by doing parrellel xfers to the drives. Not only is there no > redundancy, RAID 1 is actually less safe for data storage then a single > drive, since if 1 drive fails all the data is lost. Obviously, the more > drives in a RAID 1 array, the higher the chances for loss of data. Oops... Correction, the 2 instances of RAID 1 in this paragraph should read RAID 0 -- http://nostar.isa-geek.com/ _______________________________________________ ardour-users-ardour.org mailing list ardour-users@lists.ardour.org http://lists.ardour.org/listinfo.cgi/ardour-users-ardour.orgReceived on Wed Dec 15 13:45:23 2004
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 12/15/04 13:45 EST