Re: Quiescent filesystems marked with EXT2_VALID_FS while still mounted?

From: Andreas Bombe (andreas.bombe@munich.netsurf.de)
Date: Fri Jan 21 2000 - 20:21:30 EST

Next message: Rik van Riel: "Re: Quiescent filesystems marked with EXT2_VALID_FS while still mounted?"

Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: Interesting analysis of linux kernel threading by IBM"
In reply to: Scott Henry: "Re: Quiescent filesystems marked with EXT2_VALID_FS while still mounted?"
Next in thread: Michael Poole: "Re: Quiescent filesystems marked with EXT2_VALID_FS while still mounted?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Thu, Jan 20, 2000 at 11:29:43AM -0800, Scott Henry wrote:
> Another one that I am trying but can't get to work is to have the
> filesystem mounted "ro,user" by default, but I can't seem to "-o
> remount,rw" (or the other way) as a user. I haven't started to track
> it down yet, but is this likely to be a mount issue or a kernel
> issue?

IIRC the user option only allows the user to mount/unmount. No change
in options or fs type. Anything else would be a potential security
hole.

-- Andreas E. Bombe <andreas.bombe@munich.netsurf.de> http://home.pages.de/~andreas.bombe/ DSA key 0x04880A44

The Apocalypse has been postponed - we apologize for the inconvenience.

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Rik van Riel: "Re: Quiescent filesystems marked with EXT2_VALID_FS while still mounted?"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: Interesting analysis of linux kernel threading by IBM"
In reply to: Scott Henry: "Re: Quiescent filesystems marked with EXT2_VALID_FS while still mounted?"
Next in thread: Michael Poole: "Re: Quiescent filesystems marked with EXT2_VALID_FS while still mounted?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jan 22 2000 - 15:58:03 EST