>if you're quite sure that you haven't accidentally omitted
>the kbd or mouse drivers, my only explanation would be that
>their respective interrupts are getting ignored/etc by the
>IOAPIC code. SMP interrupts are handled quite differently
>(better, actually), but there's some fairly hair-raising
>dependence on vendor-filled tables to get interrupts mapped
>to the right sources.
Considering that kbd isn't an option at all and I got the mouse right...
>how does 2.3.40 do? SMP is really quite a lot better on a modern
>kernel (remember that "stable kernel" means "not changing much",
>and in particular does NOT mean "crashes less"...)
Kind of like the Debian versions of "stable" and "unstable?"
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jan 22 2000 - 17:47:49 EST