Re: stream.c

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Sat Jan 22 2000 - 12:41:54 EST

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: stream.c"

Previous message: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: 2.2.14 feels slow and non-interactive."
In reply to: Michael H. Warfield: "Re: stream.c"
Next in thread: Michael H. Warfield: "Re: stream.c"
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: stream.c"
Reply: Michael H. Warfield: "Re: stream.c"
Reply: Chris Evans: "Re: stream.c"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> reproduce that result. The worse we have found is that Linux boxes
> seem to slow up a bit worse than OpenBSD boxes (which don't even blink).
> I've hit Netware, Windows NT, Windows 2000, and a host (yuck - pun alert)
> of others. None died.
>

The only Linux death recorded in Red Hat testing was 2.2.13 with tulip cards,
there it tripped the rx queue starve bug that happens conveniently to be
fixed in the 2.2.14 tulip driver

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: stream.c"
Previous message: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: 2.2.14 feels slow and non-interactive."
In reply to: Michael H. Warfield: "Re: stream.c"
Next in thread: Michael H. Warfield: "Re: stream.c"
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: stream.c"
Reply: Michael H. Warfield: "Re: stream.c"
Reply: Chris Evans: "Re: stream.c"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jan 23 2000 - 03:53:22 EST