Re: [PATCH] 2.3.41 scheduler change

From: Jamie Lokier (lkd@tantalophile.demon.co.uk)
Date: Sat Jan 29 2000 - 12:41:20 EST

Next message: Mark Hahn: "Re: On optimising the scheduler for large run queues"

Previous message: Magnus Danielson: "Re: all zeroes/all ones used in host IP's..."
In reply to: Rik van Riel: "[PATCH] 2.3.41 scheduler change"
Next in thread: Rik van Riel: "Re: [PATCH] 2.3.41 scheduler change"
Next in thread: Dimitris Michailidis: "Re: [PATCH] 2.3.41 scheduler change"
Reply: Rik van Riel: "Re: [PATCH] 2.3.41 scheduler change"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Rik van Riel wrote:
> I haven't done a lot of performance tests with this scheduler
> yet, but xmms seems to use about 20% less CPU with this patch
> than without ...

Are you sure that CPU measurement is real? These sort of changes tend
to break process accounting.

-- Jamie

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Mark Hahn: "Re: On optimising the scheduler for large run queues"
Previous message: Magnus Danielson: "Re: all zeroes/all ones used in host IP's..."
In reply to: Rik van Riel: "[PATCH] 2.3.41 scheduler change"
Next in thread: Rik van Riel: "Re: [PATCH] 2.3.41 scheduler change"
Next in thread: Dimitris Michailidis: "Re: [PATCH] 2.3.41 scheduler change"
Reply: Rik van Riel: "Re: [PATCH] 2.3.41 scheduler change"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jan 29 2000 - 18:55:25 EST