Re: "Different" interactive performance.

From: David S. Miller (davem@redhat.com)
Date: Fri Feb 04 2000 - 20:30:43 EST

Next message: David S. Miller: "Re: getpeername broken? ( was Re: probably problem with "lo" interface (Re: Strange problem with 2.3.42) )"

Previous message: David S. Miller: "Re: 2.3.42 alpha updates"
In reply to: Richard B. Johnson: ""Different" interactive performance."
Next in thread: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru: "Re: "Different" interactive performance."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Yes, known problem. The new TCP acking/nagle strategies in 2.3.4x
just need some tuning, I see it here too. It's on the TODO list
but less critical than some other pressing items, it'll get fixed.

Later,
David S. Miller
davem@redhat.com

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: David S. Miller: "Re: getpeername broken? ( was Re: probably problem with "lo" interface (Re: Strange problem with 2.3.42) )"
Previous message: David S. Miller: "Re: 2.3.42 alpha updates"
In reply to: Richard B. Johnson: ""Different" interactive performance."
Next in thread: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru: "Re: "Different" interactive performance."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 04 2000 - 20:38:28 EST