Re: Patch to 3c59x.c

From: David S. Miller (davem@redhat.com)
Date: Sat Feb 12 2000 - 07:03:11 EST

Next message: Arjan van de Ven: "Re: Does anybody try to compile the 2.3 kernels at all ? :(("

Previous message: Martin Bene: "Re: Mirroring Root Disks"
In reply to: Pete Zaitcev: "Patch to 3c59x.c"
Next in thread: Russell King: "Re: Patch to 3c59x.c"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

From: Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev@metabyte.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2000 22:27:52 -0800 (PST)

   recent intruduction of DMA cache coherency interfaces
   allowed me to remove crud that I carried in my copy
   of 3c59x.c and to think about a full merge. All I need
   is this (against 2.3.43):

...

Would the responsible person take it in?

Hmmm... let me play with it on Sparc64, it works there and
semantics shoule be identical. It could just be that I became
lucky with my card or something like this.

And if the change is correct, it should be using the
__BIG_ENDIAN_BITFIELD ifdef.

Later,
David S. Miller
davem@redhat.com

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Arjan van de Ven: "Re: Does anybody try to compile the 2.3 kernels at all ? :(("
Previous message: Martin Bene: "Re: Mirroring Root Disks"
In reply to: Pete Zaitcev: "Patch to 3c59x.c"
Next in thread: Russell King: "Re: Patch to 3c59x.c"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Feb 12 2000 - 08:35:23 EST