Re: Patch to 3c59x.c

From: David S. Miller (davem@redhat.com)
Date: Sat Feb 12 2000 - 07:51:15 EST

  • Next message: Douglas Gilbert: "Re: sg.c/IrDA in 2.3.43: compile fails"

       From: Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@cern.ch>
       Date: 12 Feb 2000 12:59:02 +0100

       Why is it #ifdef __sparc__ and not __BIG_ENDIAN? Looks more like an
       endian issue to me from that patch? Nobody used 3c59x's in PPC boxen?

    __BIG_ENDIAN_BITFIELD is the proper macro, not __BIG_ENDIAN

    The former has to do with how bit fields are layed out in
    structured in memory, the latter is an intrinsic about the
    byte ordering within words on the machine.

    Later,
    David S. Miller
    davem@redhat.com

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Feb 12 2000 - 09:08:42 EST