On Sun, 13 Feb 2000, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > The bottom line: encryption driver can trivially compensate for the change.
> > So if it's a problem with on-disk format - fine, let's keep the transformation
> > in the format-handling code.
>
> Unfortunately they can not. One design problem of loopback crypto is
> that you cannot store any additional information. The only way to
> check if the user entered the right password is to see if ext2 can mount
> the file system. There is really no way to detect old and new format.
HUH? You don't need the additional information. You need a different version
of module that would work with 2.3/2.4 (and I hope that you didn't use
loopback right before the change - it's severely fscked up as of 2.3.43).
This version of module should take the page number/offset it got, take the
lo->lo_dentry->d_inode->i_mapping, find mapping->bmap(mapping, block). That
will be the on-disk block. What additional information are you talking about?
Kernel version? lo->transfer() gets lo, it gets page->index, it gets offset
within the page. What else do you need to calculate the physical block position
(== old IV)?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Feb 12 2000 - 22:03:08 EST