Re: 2.2.15pre7 oops, 2.2.14aa6 not OK !

From: Rik van Riel (riel@nl.linux.org)
Date: Tue Feb 15 2000 - 20:46:56 EST

  • Next message: Richard Gooch: "Bug in FIFO implementation in 2.3.x?"

    On Tue, 15 Feb 2000, Igor Mozetic wrote:

    > > 2.2.14aa6 survived close to VM limits for about a week.
    >
    > I take it back - 2.2.14aa6 is _not_ OK. Tonight, when I run an I/O intensive
    > (not VM intensive!) job, the load increased to 6 and I found the following in kern.log:
    >
    > Feb 15 22:15:13 badija kernel: VM: killing process xlock
    > Feb 15 22:15:16 badija kernel: VM: killing process tcsh
    > Feb 15 22:15:26 badija kernel: VM: killing process rpc.mountd
    > Feb 15 22:15:31 badija kernel: VM: terminating process XF86_SVGA
    > Feb 15 22:15:31 badija kernel: VM: killing process xload

    Could you please try 2.2.15pre7 + my OOM patch?

            http://www.surriel.com/patches/2.2.15pre7oom

    If you are unable to make it behave badly, the choice
    of which OOM mechanism to include in the next 2.2 kernel
    will be quite a bit easier :)

    thanks,

    Rik 

    --
The Internet is not a network of computers. It is a network
of people. That is its real strength.

    -
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Feb 16 2000 - 00:22:55 EST