Re: __elevator_merge

From: bug1 (bug1@netconnect.com.au)
Date: Sat Feb 26 2000 - 20:41:30 EST

  • Next message: david parsons: "Re: What /proc should contain [was: /proc/driver/microcode]"

    I asked the question on another list a week or so ago, the response i
    got is pasted in below.

    >>Andrea, I'm CC'ing you on this one, thought you might want to know about
    >>this.
    >>
    >>It's debugging output from Andrea's new elevator code. I read some of the
    >>code, but I don't quite understand why this message is printed or what it
    >>means exactly....
    >
    >I thought it was a path that shouldn't happen thus I put a printk there to
    >verify (so then I could remove such path if it wasn't triggering). Really
    >don't worry about it since it can't harm you. I'll debug it soon with the
    >new elevator updates.
    >
    >Right now I guess there's a place where I counting one more request.
    >That's only latency stuff, the heuristic will change a bit but it's a very
    >minor issue.
    >
    >Andrea

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Feb 26 2000 - 19:54:05 EST