Re: 2.3.4[89] fail to probe/id IDE properly (long)

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Tue Mar 07 2000 - 07:05:26 EST

Next message: Giuliano Procida: "Re: DMA mapping"

Previous message: Jamie Lokier: "Re: If something is not stated in POSIX we should not bother even if 90%+ of Linux system out there using it ??"
In reply to: Andre Hedrick: "Re: 2.3.4[89] fail to probe/id IDE properly (long)"
Next in thread: Tim Coleman: "Re: 2.3.4[89] fail to probe/id IDE properly (long)"
Reply: Tim Coleman: "Re: 2.3.4[89] fail to probe/id IDE properly (long)"
Reply: Andre Hedrick: "Re: 2.3.4[89] fail to probe/id IDE properly (long)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> ide is much worst than 'net' but fixable......
>
> ./drivers/net/Config.in
>
> - bool ' EISA, VLB, PCI and on board controllers' CONFIG_NET_PCI
> + if [ "$CONFIG_PCI" = "y" ]; then
> + bool ' EISA, VLB, PCI and on board controllers' CONFIG_NET_PCI
> + fi
>

That is wrong. Many of those controllers are on non PCI machines. Whoever
made that diff fucked up

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Giuliano Procida: "Re: DMA mapping"
Previous message: Jamie Lokier: "Re: If something is not stated in POSIX we should not bother even if 90%+ of Linux system out there using it ??"
In reply to: Andre Hedrick: "Re: 2.3.4[89] fail to probe/id IDE properly (long)"
Next in thread: Tim Coleman: "Re: 2.3.4[89] fail to probe/id IDE properly (long)"
Reply: Tim Coleman: "Re: 2.3.4[89] fail to probe/id IDE properly (long)"
Reply: Andre Hedrick: "Re: 2.3.4[89] fail to probe/id IDE properly (long)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Mar 07 2000 - 07:15:06 EST