Re: PATCH: /proc/irq/ fix

• Previous message: Andrew Pam: "APM suspend problems with kernel 2.3.51"
• Maybe in reply to: Roman Zippel: "PATCH: /proc/irq/ fix"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Ingo Molnar writes:
> On Fri, 10 Mar 2000, Pavel Machek wrote:

>> It might alert people that non-listed interrupts are doing something
>> strange. And it should not be much bigger than it is now -- there
>> should not be much "active but currently not used" interrupts.
>
> 64 on my box.

64 k on an S/390, from the 16-bit channel ID.
(not saying I wouldn't like this change on my PC though)

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Thorsten Kranzkowski: "Re: Linux-2.3.51, and the pre-2.4 series.."
• Previous message: Andrew Pam: "APM suspend problems with kernel 2.3.51"
• Maybe in reply to: Roman Zippel: "PATCH: /proc/irq/ fix"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Mar 11 2000 - 20:40:45 EST