Re: 2.3.99pre2-3: ide_xlate_1024 not linked in

From: Andre Hedrick (andre@suse.com)
Date: Sat Mar 18 2000 - 04:31:15 EST

  • Next message: James Sutherland: "Re: Overcommitable memory??"

    Join the crowd........

    Dirty now is to double name the function and BLOAT!
    Force dependences of partitions against block|ide........
    WTF..........

    ide_xlate_1024 >> block_xlate_1024 and is not module, but forced into the
    kernel......not likely.........

    The ablity to load msdos.o without ide-mod.o present of compiled
    in.....KABOOM!!!!!!!!!

    Fun, eeh :_((((((((((((

    On Fri, 17 Mar 2000, Adam J. Richter wrote:

    > If I try to build linux-2.3.99pre2-3 with IDE drivers
    > compiled as a modules, I get an undefined reference to ide_xlate_1024,
    > because the msdos partition code wants it. I am still thinking
    > about what the right way is to fix this.
    >
    > Adam J. Richter __ ______________ 4880 Stevens Creek Blvd, Suite 104
    > adam@yggdrasil.com \ / San Jose, California 95129-1034
    > +1 408 261-6630 | g g d r a s i l United States of America
    > fax +1 408 261-6631 "Free Software For The Rest Of Us."
    >
    > -
    > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
    > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
    >

    Andre Hedrick
    The Linux ATA/IDE guy

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Mar 18 2000 - 15:28:15 EST