Re: io_request_lock and system performance (can it be replaced?)

From: Richard Gooch (rgooch@ras.ucalgary.ca)
Date: Thu Mar 23 2000 - 16:29:41 EST

  • Next message: Karel Kulhavy: "IRQ's dumb"

    Riley Williams writes:
    > Hi Alan.
    >
    > > In part the lock should only be held very briefly so it
    > > shouldnt be that contented.
    >
    > I'm not sure whether the locks should be contented or not, but I
    > would suspect the maintainers and developers would brefer to be
                                                         ^
    > contented...
    >
    > I would presume you meant "contenDed" though...

    Yes, I would Prefer that we all made no spelling mistakes.

                                    Regards,

                                            Richard....
    Permanent: rgooch@atnf.csiro.au
    Current: rgooch@ras.ucalgary.ca

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Mar 23 2000 - 16:45:00 EST