Re: VM modules in kernel?

From: Arjan van de Ven (arjan@fenrus.demon.nl)
Date: Fri Mar 24 2000 - 13:39:01 EST

  • Next message: Jesse Pollard: "Re: Avoiding OOM on overcommit...?"

    In article <E12YY4n-0002Ep-00@the-village.bc.nu> you wrote:
    >> I was thinking that faster VM speeds may be possible if the
    >> kernel can be tweaked more freely due to the GPL nature of the
    >> Plex86/bochs projects now.

    > Remember something here. IBM tuned the hardware to this, and to an extent
    > they tuned the software on top of VM. They have a lot of cards to play that
    > Motorola m68K chips did but x86 does not.

    > Im hoping transmeta can manage to add a virtualised 386 mode to their chip.
    > Here's hoping they are listening ;)

    Also interesting is the following URL (was on /.) about HP's Dynamo:

    http://www.arstechnica.com/reviews/1q00/dynamo/dynamo-1.html

    In short, the article claims that a virtualized CPU is/can be faster than
    a "normal" CPU. Would be cool: Define a "Linux userspace instruction set"
    and let the kernel optimize it to the processor-of-the-day.

    Greetings,
       Arjan van de Ven

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Mar 24 2000 - 13:52:45 EST