Re: [RFC] One solution for the oom/overcommit debate

From: Horst von Brand (vonbrand@sleipnir.valparaiso.cl)
Date: Sat Mar 25 2000 - 18:04:18 EST

Next message: David Whysong: "Re: Virtual vs. physical swap & shared memory forks (clone)"

Previous message: Guest section DW: "Re: Linux makes 30G WD disk confused about its identity"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Steffen Ullrich <coyote.frank@gmx.net> said:

> A few years ago (after getting OOM problems on Digital UNIX where it
> killed the inetd process and locked me out remotly) I had a similar idea
> (but it's sti ll only an idea, nothing implemented):

Rik _has_ implemented something, and many have tried it...

-- Horst von Brand vonbrand@sleipnir.valparaiso.cl Casilla 9G, Viña del Mar, Chile +56 32 672616

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: David Whysong: "Re: Virtual vs. physical swap & shared memory forks (clone)"
Previous message: Guest section DW: "Re: Linux makes 30G WD disk confused about its identity"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Mar 25 2000 - 19:19:19 EST