Re: Bug in eepro100.c? NETDEV_WATCHDOG

• Previous message: Boris Okun: "Re: problems with do_slow_gettimeoffset()"
• In reply to: Brian Macy: "Bug in eepro100.c? NETDEV_WATCHDOG"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hello,

Your card hadn't executed any of the command in the transmit ring.
May be it's initialization problems.

First of all, try recent kernel (testing/pre4-2) with the heavily modified
driver. If the problem persists, run the driver with debug=3 option and send
the output to me privately.

Best regards
                                        Andrey V.
                                        Savochkin

On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 01:59:03PM -0800, Brian Macy wrote:
> Here's the kern.log dump from the last time I rebooted and it had the
> problem. It *almost* always does this... but everyonce in a while it
> doesn't (my last reboot didn't). If I run pump manually after boot it
> eventually triggers the watchdog and works fine from then on.
>
> from /var/log/kern.log:
> Mar 30 22:24:09 job kernel: NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit timed out
> Mar 30 22:24:09 job kernel: eth0: Transmit timed out: status 0000 0090
> at 0/12 command 0001a000.
> Mar 30 22:24:09 job kernel: eth0: Tx ring dump, Tx queue 12 / 0:
> Mar 30 22:24:09 job kernel: eth0: * 0 0001a000.
> Mar 30 22:24:09 job kernel: eth0: 1 00020000.
> Mar 30 22:24:09 job kernel: eth0: 2 00030000.
> Mar 30 22:24:09 job kernel: eth0: 3 00030000.
> Mar 30 22:24:09 job kernel: eth0: 4 00030000.
> Mar 30 22:24:09 job kernel: eth0: 5 00030000.
> Mar 30 22:24:09 job kernel: eth0: 6 000c0000.
> Mar 30 22:24:09 job kernel: eth0: 7 000c0000.
> Mar 30 22:24:09 job kernel: eth0: 8 000c0000.
> Mar 30 22:24:09 job kernel: eth0: 9 000c0000.
> Mar 30 22:24:09 job kernel: eth0: 10 000c0000.
> Mar 30 22:24:09 job kernel: eth0: 11 400c0000.
> Mar 30 22:24:09 job kernel: eth0: =12 40030000.
> Mar 30 22:24:09 job kernel: eth0: 13 00000000.
> Mar 30 22:24:09 job kernel: eth0: 14 00000000.
> Mar 30 22:24:09 job kernel: eth0: 15 00000000.
> Mar 30 22:24:09 job kernel: eth0: 16 00000000.
> Mar 30 22:24:09 job kernel: eth0: 17 00000000.
> Mar 30 22:24:09 job kernel: eth0: 18 00000000.
> Mar 30 22:24:09 job kernel: eth0: 19 00000000.
> Mar 30 22:24:09 job kernel: eth0: 20 00000000.
> Mar 30 22:24:09 job kernel: eth0: 21 00000000.
> Mar 30 22:24:09 job kernel: eth0: 22 00000000.
> Mar 30 22:24:09 job kernel: eth0: 23 00000000.
> Mar 30 22:24:09 job kernel: eth0: 24 00000000.
> Mar 30 22:24:09 job kernel: eth0: 25 00000000.
> Mar 30 22:24:09 job kernel: eth0: 26 00000000.
> Mar 30 22:24:09 job kernel: eth0: 27 00000000.
> Mar 30 22:24:09 job kernel: eth0: 28 00000000.
> Mar 30 22:24:09 job kernel: eth0: 29 00000000.
> Mar 30 22:24:09 job kernel: eth0: 30 00000000.
> Mar 30 22:24:09 job kernel: eth0: 31 00000000.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Vince Weaver: "GPF on 6502 Linux with 2.3.99-pre4"
• Previous message: Boris Okun: "Re: problems with do_slow_gettimeoffset()"
• In reply to: Brian Macy: "Bug in eepro100.c? NETDEV_WATCHDOG"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Mar 31 2000 - 23:56:25 EST