Re: -fno-strict-aliasing

From: Horst von Brand (vonbrand@inf.utfsm.cl)
Date: Tue Apr 18 2000 - 14:04:28 EDT

  • Next message: Michael Warfield: "Re: Security in general (was Re: Proposal "LUID")"

    Robert Dinse <nanook@eskimo.com> said:
    > On Tue, 18 Apr 2000, Giacomo Catenazzi wrote:
    > > no-strict-aliasing is documented. You should remember that gcc is a GNU
    > > program, also with old unmaintened man pages and the documentations put in
    > > 'info pages'. (This is due to the GNU manual policy)

    > I don't know what the GNU manual policy is but I'm not fond of info. At
    > any rate, yes, it is documented there but it's inclusion in the compilation
    > flags is nonsensical if the documentation is correct.

    At one point in time (during egcs) -fstrict-aliasing was the default, but
    too much illegal code out there broke (including the kernel, thus the
    -fno-strict-aliasing), and it was turned off.

    -- 
    Dr. Horst H. von Brand                       mailto:vonbrand@inf.utfsm.cl
    Departamento de Informatica                     Fono: +56 32 654431
    Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria              +56 32 654239
    Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile                Fax:  +56 32 797513
    

    - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Apr 18 2000 - 14:54:31 EDT