Re: [PATCH] f_op->poll() without lock_kernel()

From: David S. Miller (davem@redhat.com)
Date: Fri Apr 21 2000 - 20:31:13 EDT

  • Next message: Alexander Viro: "Re: [PATCH] f_op->poll() without lock_kernel()"

       Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2000 20:28:53 -0400 (EDT)
       From: Alexander Viro <viro@math.psu.edu>

       On Fri, 21 Apr 2000, David S. Miller wrote:

    > I highly approve of this, please just do it.

       Dave, what's up with sock_no_foo() stuff? Mind if I'll replace (some
       of?) them with NULLs, taking the tests into net/socket.c?

    Please no, the whole point of the sock_no_*() stuff was to _REMOVE_
    the tests from the socket.c code.

    Later,
    David S. Miller
    davem@redhat.com

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Apr 21 2000 - 20:54:14 EDT