Re: [PATCH] f_op->poll() without lock_kernel()

From: Alexander Viro (viro@math.psu.edu)
Date: Fri Apr 21 2000 - 20:44:42 EDT

  • Next message: Matthew Dharm: "Re: [RFC] Flat /lib/modules/`uname -r`"

    On Fri, 21 Apr 2000, David S. Miller wrote:

    > Dave, what's up with sock_no_foo() stuff? Mind if I'll replace (some
    > of?) them with NULLs, taking the tests into net/socket.c?
    >
    > Please no, the whole point of the sock_no_*() stuff was to _REMOVE_
    > the tests from the socket.c code.

    Point taken, but I still want to look who calls them and how many PFs have
    non-default stuff in the first place. E.g. ->mmap() just looks wrong. Oh,
    well...

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Apr 21 2000 - 20:59:05 EDT