Re: Possible TCP Problem with RH6.2 talking to Solaris2.6/2.7 (fwd)

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Thu May 04 2000 - 11:44:21 EDT

Next message: Petr Vandrovec: "PATCH: 2.3.99-pre7.4 and drivers/net/atp.c"

Previous message: Shane Shrybman: "Re: classzone-VM + mapped pages out of lru_cache"
In reply to: Jes Sorensen: "Re: Possible TCP Problem with RH6.2 talking to Solaris2.6/2.7 (fwd)"
Reply: shane: "Re: Possible TCP Problem with RH6.2 talking to Solaris2.6/2.7 (fwd)"
Reply: James Sutherland: "Re: Possible TCP Problem with RH6.2 talking to Solaris2.6/2.7 (fwd)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> shane> Not Much Difference :(
>
> You're using WHAT as a benchmark?
>
> I am sorry but ftp is like the stupidiest thing to use for any sort of

Its actually not too silly in this case. Trying a transfer into /dev/null
may be a good idea for testing the 'is this disk or net' thats the bottleneck
and doing a ttcp test to compare is wise.

THe ncftp client should be quite sane

Alan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Petr Vandrovec: "PATCH: 2.3.99-pre7.4 and drivers/net/atp.c"
Previous message: Shane Shrybman: "Re: classzone-VM + mapped pages out of lru_cache"
In reply to: Jes Sorensen: "Re: Possible TCP Problem with RH6.2 talking to Solaris2.6/2.7 (fwd)"
Reply: shane: "Re: Possible TCP Problem with RH6.2 talking to Solaris2.6/2.7 (fwd)"
Reply: James Sutherland: "Re: Possible TCP Problem with RH6.2 talking to Solaris2.6/2.7 (fwd)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu May 04 2000 - 13:12:16 EDT