Re: devfs persistence

From: Richard Gooch (rgooch@ras.ucalgary.ca)
Date: Fri May 05 2000 - 18:37:53 EDT

  • Next message: Andre Hedrick: "Re: IDE Controllers"

    Michael Marxmeier writes:
    > Brian Kress wrote:
    > > LVM has to run a userspace program vgscan to load the location
    > > of the lvm partitions into kernelspace. It does this by scanning
    > > EVERY device in /dev for an LVM signature. While I really like LVM,
    > ^^^
    > Nope. Only block devices.
    >
    > > this part strikes me as rather unclean. Devfs does help with this
    > > a bit, since then at least its not scanning non-existant devices. An
    >
    > /proc/partitions is used. So again only known block devices are
    > scanned.
    > And this needs to be done in order to detect pv signature and
    > construct the volume groups.
    >
    > > MD style kernel-based autodetect for LVM would be really nice, but I
    > > think Heinz is really busy (since LVM 0.8 for 2.2.x still hasn't
    > > shown up).
    >
    > IMHO there is no need to rush and bloat the kernel.
    > It is not too hard to place vgscan/vgchange in the kernel but
    > there are other options (like a temporary root block device)
    > which should be considered.
    > IMHO the initrd aproach should work reasonable for now.

    No, we don't want the added complexity of initrd. Anyway, the MD
    solution is available.

                                    Regards,

                                            Richard....
    Permanent: rgooch@atnf.csiro.au
    Current: rgooch@ras.ucalgary.ca

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri May 05 2000 - 19:22:41 EDT