Re: devfs persistence

From: Stephen C. Tweedie (sct@redhat.com)
Date: Sat May 06 2000 - 07:44:52 EDT

Next message: Stephen C. Tweedie: "Re: Helding the Kernel lock while doing IO???"

Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: [OT] an Amicus Curae to the Honorable Thomas Penfield"
In reply to: Richard Gooch: "Re: devfs persistence"
Reply: Richard Gooch: "Re: devfs persistence"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi,

On Fri, May 05, 2000 at 04:37:53PM -0600, Richard Gooch wrote:
>
> No, we don't want the added complexity of initrd. Anyway, the MD
> solution is available.

initrd is not even available on some platforms.

--Stephen

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Stephen C. Tweedie: "Re: Helding the Kernel lock while doing IO???"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: [OT] an Amicus Curae to the Honorable Thomas Penfield"
In reply to: Richard Gooch: "Re: devfs persistence"
Reply: Richard Gooch: "Re: devfs persistence"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat May 06 2000 - 07:49:58 EDT