Re: [RFC] Standard Sytem Config Filesystem (has /proc and devfs implications)

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Tue May 09 2000 - 18:18:06 EDT

Next message: Joakim Recht: "SMP+ne.o+reiserfs=freeze?"

Previous message: BenHanokh Gabriel: "Re: block allocation in ext2fs"
In reply to: dg50@daimlerchrysler.com: "[RFC] Standard Sytem Config Filesystem (has /proc and devfs implications)"
Next in thread: Austin Schutz: "Re: [RFC] Standard Sytem Config Filesystem (has /proc and devfs implications)"
Reply: Austin Schutz: "Re: [RFC] Standard Sytem Config Filesystem (has /proc and devfs implications)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> The major target for this proposal is the Linux Standard Base folks, but my
> (perhaps entirely mistaken) impression is that the LSB is a little more
> politically driven body than linux-kernel, where it seems like "what's
> Right and works well wins". As well, there are some small kernel-space

The LSB goal is 'whats already working and everyone agrees has worked for
ages' wins. The idea is to have a standard not to have ideas ;)

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Joakim Recht: "SMP+ne.o+reiserfs=freeze?"
Previous message: BenHanokh Gabriel: "Re: block allocation in ext2fs"
In reply to: dg50@daimlerchrysler.com: "[RFC] Standard Sytem Config Filesystem (has /proc and devfs implications)"
Next in thread: Austin Schutz: "Re: [RFC] Standard Sytem Config Filesystem (has /proc and devfs implications)"
Reply: Austin Schutz: "Re: [RFC] Standard Sytem Config Filesystem (has /proc and devfs implications)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue May 09 2000 - 19:06:41 EDT