On 10 May 2000, Michael Poole wrote:
> > > For example the 2.3.99-pre2 was corrupting data for me. And
> > > this is supposedly stable kernel.
>
> 2.3.xx isn't supposedly stable, just hopefully stable -- it would have
> an even minor number if it were really supposedly stable.
Bad choice of words on my part. By "supposedly stable" kernel I meant that
"it is unstable development kernel which is becoming stable since it is
nearing end of development cycle for 2.3.x series".
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 10 2000 - 11:29:56 EDT