Re: max ext2 fs size

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Thu May 11 2000 - 14:15:45 EDT

Next message: Ed Carp: "Re: serial.c"

Previous message: Linus Torvalds: "Re: [PATCH] int (*readpage)(struct file *, struct page *);"
In reply to: Rik van Riel: "Re: max ext2 fs size"
Next in thread: Chris Wedgwood: "Re: max ext2 fs size"
Next in thread: willy@thepuffingroup.com: "Re: max ext2 fs size"
Reply: Chris Wedgwood: "Re: max ext2 fs size"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> If you have >2TB of disk and run into this limit, it shouldn't
> be more than a minor inconvenience to move to a 64-bit platform.
> I don't want to imagine the fsck times on a 2 TB filesystem though ;)

At that point you apply the ext3 patches

Alan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Ed Carp: "Re: serial.c"
Previous message: Linus Torvalds: "Re: [PATCH] int (*readpage)(struct file *, struct page *);"
In reply to: Rik van Riel: "Re: max ext2 fs size"
Next in thread: Chris Wedgwood: "Re: max ext2 fs size"
Next in thread: willy@thepuffingroup.com: "Re: max ext2 fs size"
Reply: Chris Wedgwood: "Re: max ext2 fs size"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu May 11 2000 - 14:38:22 EDT