Re: [RFC] Standard Sytem Config Filesystem (has /proc and devfs implications)

From: Alexander Viro (viro@math.psu.edu)
Date: Thu May 11 2000 - 22:12:17 EDT

  • Next message: Ed Carp: "Re: For Alan Cox ..."

    On Wed, 10 May 2000 dg50@daimlerchrysler.com wrote:

    > > There's no way anyone is going to move really basic stuff like
    > > inetd.conf or passwd out of /etc. Too many preexisting things depend on
    > > their locations.
    >
    > I disagree. I think it can be done, and should be done.
    >
    > "Too many preexisting programs depend on libc5 t change the C lib"
    > "Too many preexisting machines depend on a.out file formats to move to ELF"
    > ...and so on.

    <rant>
    Why do we need to create extra pain for heterogeneous setups? WTF make it
    even more painful for every normal UNIX sysadmin who already has to deal
    with zillions of morons^Wvendors with rectal itch to move the stuff
    around? /etc/passwd not there? Too fscking bad and thank you for trying -
    like hell I'll use this idiocy.
    </rant>

            Sigh... People, could we please recall that there is such thing
    as compatibility? Yeah, I know, it's incompatible with the only other OS
    known to most of current users anyway. But there is that thing called
    "other Unices" and there is a long history of attempts to implement The
    Grand New Schemes(tm) - just ask the victims of AIX, etc. Do we _really_
    have to follow this tradition of vendor idiocy?

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu May 11 2000 - 23:05:59 EDT