>From summer@OS2.ami.com.au Fri May 12 23:06:31 2000
Return-Path: <summer@os2.ami.com.au>
X-Received: from localhost (IDENT:root@localhost [127.0.0.1])
by emu.os2.ami.com.au (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id XAA04614
for <listreader@possum>; Fri, 12 May 2000 23:05:30 +0800
X-Received: from os2.ami.com.au
by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.3.8)
for listreader@possum (single-drop); Fri, 12 May 2000 23:05:30 +0800 (WST)
X-Received: (from summer@localhost)
by os2.ami.com.au (8.9.1/8.9.0) id IAA01199
for lister@localhost; Fri, 12 May 2000 08:52:11 +0800
X-Received: from samba.anu.edu.au (samba.anu.edu.au [150.203.164.44])
by os2.ami.com.au (8.9.1/8.9.0) with ESMTP id IAA01194
for <summer@os2.ami.com.au>; Fri, 12 May 2000 08:52:03 +0800
X-Received: from vger.rutgers.edu ([128.6.190.2]:11306 "EHLO vger.rutgers.edu")
by samba.org with ESMTP id <S13085782AbQELAvd>;
Fri, 12 May 2000 10:51:33 +1000
X-Received: by vger.rutgers.edu via listexpand id <S155252AbQELAKf>;
Thu, 11 May 2000 20:10:35 -0400
X-Received: by vger.rutgers.edu id <S155192AbQEKXw3>;
Thu, 11 May 2000 19:52:29 -0400
X-Received: from fe4.rdc-kc.rr.com ([24.94.163.51]:1478 "EHLO mail4.kc.rr.com")
by vger.rutgers.edu with ESMTP id <S155392AbQEKXsa>;
Thu, 11 May 2000 19:48:30 -0400
X-Received: from microdog ([24.94.171.100]) by mail4.kc.rr.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.357.35);
Thu, 11 May 2000 18:59:44 -0500
X-Received: by kc.rr.com
via sendmail from stdin
id <m12q2ro-000WW9C@microdog> (Debian Smail3.2.0.102)
for linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu; Thu, 11 May 2000 18:59:44 -0500 (CDT)
In-Reply-To: Alan Cox's message of "Thu, 11 May 2000 23:52:07 +0100 (BST)"
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0803 (Gnus v5.8.3) Emacs/20.5
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing-dig
X-UIDL: 2f6bbe0213eba78b21d7125176cbd764
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> writes:
> ORBS lists sites they cannot probe
True, but they also seem to malign providers that don't cooperate. Here's a
quote, for example
In general: <b>Hosts/Networks blocking the testers have something to
hide.</b> If their mail servers are secure then they have nothing to worry
about from the ORBS tester.
> If you dig for an rr address you get back a reply indicated that probing
> this range is blocked. Most people I know dont do ORBS drops of mail on that
> reply, in fact most dont even do scoring on a 'blocked range' reply.
I imagine that's true. You're the first recipient I've had bounce my mail
because of RR.
--Mike
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat May 13 2000 - 11:25:32 EDT