Re: Kernel-level checkpointing

From: Lars Marowsky-Bree (lmb@suse.de)
Date: Sun May 14 2000 - 18:50:36 EDT

Next message: Michal Vitecek: "Re: Seconded: 2.2.15 slow as molasses"

Previous message: Jeff Garzik: "Re: 3com 3c905c-txm"
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: Kernel-level checkpointing"
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: Kernel-level checkpointing"
Next in thread: Andrew Morton: "Re: Kernel-level checkpointing"
Reply: Alan Cox: "Re: Kernel-level checkpointing"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 2000-05-14T22:32:51,
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> said:

> > This hasn't been developed yet. All the solutions I have seen so far
> > implement that in the application, which saves its state in regular
> > intervals. I assume this will be the most efficient solution in any case.
> its been done for 2.0

Anybody porting that though?

Sincerely,
Lars Marowsky-Brée <lmb@suse.de>
Development HA

-- Perfection is our goal, excellence will be tolerated. -- J. Yahl

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Michal Vitecek: "Re: Seconded: 2.2.15 slow as molasses"
Previous message: Jeff Garzik: "Re: 3com 3c905c-txm"
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: Kernel-level checkpointing"
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: Kernel-level checkpointing"
Next in thread: Andrew Morton: "Re: Kernel-level checkpointing"
Reply: Alan Cox: "Re: Kernel-level checkpointing"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun May 14 2000 - 18:55:22 EDT