Re: Kernel-level checkpointing

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Sun May 14 2000 - 18:51:24 EDT

Next message: sad@valinux.com: "Re: PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_82440MX_1 is not defined in 2.3.99-pre9-1"

Previous message: Michal Vitecek: "Re: Seconded: 2.2.15 slow as molasses"
In reply to: Lars Marowsky-Bree: "Re: Kernel-level checkpointing"
Next in thread: Andrew Morton: "Re: Kernel-level checkpointing"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> > > intervals. I assume this will be the most efficient solution in any case.
> > its been done for 2.0
>
> Anybody porting that though?

Not afaik

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: sad@valinux.com: "Re: PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_82440MX_1 is not defined in 2.3.99-pre9-1"
Previous message: Michal Vitecek: "Re: Seconded: 2.2.15 slow as molasses"
In reply to: Lars Marowsky-Bree: "Re: Kernel-level checkpointing"
Next in thread: Andrew Morton: "Re: Kernel-level checkpointing"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun May 14 2000 - 19:05:10 EDT