Re: 2.2.15 performance issues (sort of VM fiasco)

From: Markus Stenberg (mstenber@cc.Helsinki.FI)
Date: Mon May 15 2000 - 02:36:39 EDT

  • Next message: Mads Martin Jørgensen: "Re: BFS and BeOS FS..."

    Paul Barton-Davis <pbd@Op.Net> writes:
    > Although I understand that the problems with VM are ongoing in
    > 2.3.99-preXX, I have been very discouraged that 2.2.15 (in marked
    > contrast to 2.2.10, and possibly above) has been rendered unusable
    > with apps that do substantial amounts of streaming disk i/o.

    2.2.14 works fine, although I think that 2.2 series in general seems to
    have braindead paging behavior. To be precise: I think that some form of
    "maximal/minimal buffer size" option seems to be in order soon, as (back at
    my previous company) I had machine with "only" 128MB of RAM, and I
    regularly used only 60-90MB of it, and it still swapped like hell under 2.2
    series in general and 2.2.14 in particular, whenever I did something
    disk-heavy such as "cvs update". It raped the performance, so I wound up
    turning swapfile off. No more problems.

    In my next place of employment, I needed bit more bloated apps so I got
    192MB of RAM, turned swap off, and even 2.2.15 works fine for me
    :-P

    > -
    > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
    > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    -Markus

    -- 
    "Catapultam habeo. Nisi pecuniam omnem mihi dabis, ad caput tuum saxum
    immane mittam."
    

    "I have a catapult. Unless you give me all the money, I will throw an enormous rock at your head."

    -- stolen from someone's .sig at some time [1996?]

    - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon May 15 2000 - 02:40:47 EDT