Re: Proposal: int (permission)(struct dentry , int)

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Mon May 15 2000 - 15:49:17 EDT

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: Proposal: int (permission*)(struct dentry *, int)"

Previous message: Kristoffer Brånemyr: "Unresolved symbols in lockd.o in 2.3.99-pre8"
In reply to: Linus Torvalds: "Re: Proposal: int (permission*)(struct dentry *, int)"
Next in thread: Brent Callaghan: "Re: Proposal: int (permission*)(struct dentry *, int)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> design. We could have had much simpler filesystems without state if we
> just used a pathname. Somewhat like SMB (which is a bad filesystem too,
> but for _other_ reasons ;)

Not really because of the rename issues. Not that NFS gets rename right
safely for all cases

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: Proposal: int (permission*)(struct dentry *, int)"
Previous message: Kristoffer Brånemyr: "Unresolved symbols in lockd.o in 2.3.99-pre8"
In reply to: Linus Torvalds: "Re: Proposal: int (permission*)(struct dentry *, int)"
Next in thread: Brent Callaghan: "Re: Proposal: int (permission*)(struct dentry *, int)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon May 15 2000 - 16:21:23 EDT