Re: Can O_SYNC be implemented by using fsync?

From: Andi Kleen (ak@suse.de)
Date: Mon May 15 2000 - 16:51:10 EDT

  • Next message: Benhanokh Gabriel: "open & write in kernel mode"

    On Mon, May 15, 2000 at 02:16:41PM -0600, Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
    >
    >
    > Bill Wendling wrote:
    > >
    > > Also sprach Pavel Machek:
    > >
    > > }
    > > I wouldn't count on that. If my failed patches were any indication, it's
    > > heavily used by apps like Netscape...
    >
    > Why the hell is Netscape doing this? Netscape is a browser/mail
    > program, not a multi-user database, or are you refering to the server
    > side of NetScape? This doesn't sound right! Why would Netscape need to
    > write-through files all the time -- for browser failover?

    Netscape is a mail client. For mailers it makes sense to flush
    mailbox updates to disk. It seems to use a quite complicated
    database for its mail store.

    Also I guess fsync()ing bookmarks updates is useful.

    -Andi

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon May 15 2000 - 17:11:18 EDT