Re: Can O_SYNC be implemented by using fsync?

From: Jesse Pollard (pollard@cats-chateau.net)
Date: Fri May 19 2000 - 14:54:04 EDT

  • Next message: jmcmullan@linuxcare.com: "Re: Sharing memory between user and kernel spaces [Re: copy_to/from_user and a bottom half]"

    On Mon, 15 May 2000, Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
    >Bill Wendling wrote:
    >>
    >> Also sprach Pavel Machek:
    >>
    >> }
    >> I wouldn't count on that. If my failed patches were any indication, it's
    >> heavily used by apps like Netscape...
    >
    >Why the hell is Netscape doing this? Netscape is a browser/mail
    >program, not a multi-user database, or are you refering to the server
    >side of NetScape? This doesn't sound right! Why would Netscape need to
    >write-through files all the time -- for browser failover?

    I believe it is for the certificate database - you wouldn't want it damaged
    by software aborts - also the indexed history table. Yes, there is a
    lock on the directory, but it looks like there is a foundation for a
    shared history.
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Jesse I Pollard, II
    Email: pollard@cats-chateau.net

    Any opinions expressed are solely my own.

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri May 19 2000 - 15:01:28 EDT