Re: [patch] Re: 2.2.16pre nls in 2.3?

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Sat May 20 2000 - 12:48:44 EDT

Next message: Linus Torvalds: "Re: [PATCH] Fix deadlocks in filemap_write_page, fixes ReiserFS for >= pre7-4, etc."

Previous message: Urban Widmark: "Re: [patch] Re: 2.2.16pre nls in 2.3?"
In reply to: Urban Widmark: "Re: [patch] Re: 2.2.16pre nls in 2.3?"
Next in thread: Petr Vandrovec: "Re: [patch] Re: 2.2.16pre nls in 2.3?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> No ... this uni1, uni2 stuff combined with 16bit unicode/x86 little endian
> makes my head spin.
>
> But it breaks in my testprogram. fs/fat/dir.c does it the other way
> around. The first argument is ch (high?), the other cl (low?)

Umm do ISO and FAT use different endiannesses here ?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Linus Torvalds: "Re: [PATCH] Fix deadlocks in filemap_write_page, fixes ReiserFS for >= pre7-4, etc."
Previous message: Urban Widmark: "Re: [patch] Re: 2.2.16pre nls in 2.3?"
In reply to: Urban Widmark: "Re: [patch] Re: 2.2.16pre nls in 2.3?"
Next in thread: Petr Vandrovec: "Re: [patch] Re: 2.2.16pre nls in 2.3?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat May 20 2000 - 12:52:50 EDT