Re: Proposal: int (permission*)(struct dentry *, int)

• Previous message: Christopher Thompson: "TSC patch was: Linux 2.3.99pre9-2 JOB list"
• In reply to: Alexander Viro: "Re: Proposal: int (permission*)(struct dentry *, int)"
• Next in thread: Roman V. Shaposhnick: "Re: Proposal: int (permission*)(struct dentry *, int)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, May 15, 2000 at 07:34:35PM -0400, Alexander Viro wrote:
>
> Yeah, right... Make it
> msdos/vfat, hfs, most likely hpfs/ntfs, smbfs, ncpfs, nfs -
> everything except the normal UNIX filesystems (I omitted stuff like procfs
> - these are not exportable too).

NTFS should be fine. We have an inode number that is UNIX-like (invariant
across rename, reboot, etc.), and a generation number.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Gérard Roudier: "Re: PCI MMIO flushing and stuff (was Re: 2.2.15 with eepro100: eth0: Too much work at interrupt)"
• Previous message: Christopher Thompson: "TSC patch was: Linux 2.3.99pre9-2 JOB list"
• In reply to: Alexander Viro: "Re: Proposal: int (permission*)(struct dentry *, int)"
• Next in thread: Roman V. Shaposhnick: "Re: Proposal: int (permission*)(struct dentry *, int)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat May 20 2000 - 16:57:25 EDT