i dunno, i'm running:
eepro100.c: $Revision: 1.20.2.3 $ 2000/03/02 Modified by Andrey V.
Savochkin <saw@saw.sw.com.sg> and others
eth0: Intel PCI EtherExpress Pro100 at 0xcc802000, IRQ 15.
Board assembly 645520-034, Physical connectors present: RJ45
Primary interface chip DP83840 PHY #1.
with 2.2.15pre18 and gcc 2.95.1 without any problems whatsoever. uptime is
around 39 days.
unless you're talking about a different chip/assembly.
-Tony
.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-.
Anthony J. Biacco Network Administrator/Engineer
admin@intergrafix.net Intergrafix Internet Services
"Dream as if you'll live forever, live as if you'll die today"
http://cygnus.ncohafmuta.com http://www.intergrafix.net
.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-.
On Mon, 22 May 2000, Cedric Ware wrote:
>
>
> Hello,
>
> On Sat, May 20, 2000 at 01:25:34PM +0200, I wrote:
> > Now I thought of something: Debian-frozen's gcc is 2.95.2, and kernels
> > used not to support versions other than 2.7.2.3. Has there been a change
> > in that policy? Should I try building with the older gcc?
>
> Well, I have rebuilt a 2.2.15 kernel + eepro100.c revision 1.20.2.5 with
> gcc 2.7.2.3 and haven't yet been able to reproduce the problem (38 reboots
> today). What do you think? Does anybody compile his kernels with the
> latest versions of gcc?
>
> Thank you,
> Cedric Ware.
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue May 23 2000 - 17:49:18 EDT