Re: killall -9 does not work !?

From: Tapio Peltonen (tappel@utu.fi)
Date: Wed May 24 2000 - 11:16:49 EDT

  • Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: bit twiddling"

    On Wed, 24 May 2000, Alan Cox wrote:

    > > to reboot a UNIX box because a ufsdump or an mt or something got a lock
    > > on a tape device and hung. There should probably be a way to kick a
    > > process out of uninturruptable sleep, shouldn't there?
    >
    > Not neccessarily. A lot of uninterruptible sleeps are 'if this fails its
    > reboot time' type of events. Also they should never get stuck in state 'D'.

    Well, I had to boot this machine today after experimenting with vmware: I
    couldn't remove the vmnet module because it was busy (for whatever
    reason), I couldn't ifconfig the virtual network down and all ifconfigs
    went into 'D' state (forever), similarly to few other processes (namely
    sendmail, if it had worked I wouldn't have had to boot). Kernel 2.2.14.

    If there had been any way to forcibly remove a module or forcibly kill a
    'D' process, I'd have had much less trouble.

    -- 
                Tapio Peltonen <tappel@utu.fi>
             [macky@freenet.hut.fi">http://www.jyu.fi/cgi-bin/finger?macky@freenet.hut.fi]
          This novel is not to be tossed lightly aside, but to be hurled with
       great force.            -- Dorothy Parker
    

    - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 24 2000 - 11:39:04 EDT