Re: -O2 vs -O3

From: Matthias Andree (ma@dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de)
Date: Wed May 24 2000 - 20:16:57 EDT

Next message: Matthias Andree: "Re: [PATCH][2.3.99-pre9] arch/i386/config.in PM xconfig bug"

Previous message: Eric S. Raymond: "Re: Announcing CML2, a replacement for the kbuild system"
Next in thread: Johan Kullstam: "Re: -O2 vs -O3"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de> writes:

> Because the only difference between -O2 and -O3 is -finline-functions,
> which is bad for the kernel sources (which wants to control inlining
> explicitly).

Which could OTOH be defeated explicitly by means of
-fno-inline-functions, could not it?

-- Matthias Andree

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Matthias Andree: "Re: [PATCH][2.3.99-pre9] arch/i386/config.in PM xconfig bug"
Previous message: Eric S. Raymond: "Re: Announcing CML2, a replacement for the kbuild system"
Next in thread: Johan Kullstam: "Re: -O2 vs -O3"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 24 2000 - 21:27:41 EDT