Re: _exit(), tcflush() and all that (Re: Problem: shell prompt doesn't

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Thu May 25 2000 - 16:08:13 EDT

Next message: Dave Cinege: "Re: ramfs: mounting ramfs as / at boot time"

Previous message: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: FW: Kernel 2.4.0-test1 - compile problems with msr.c"
In reply to: Ishikawa: "Re: _exit(), tcflush() and all that (Re: Problem: shell prompt doesn't"
Next in thread: Ishikawa: "Re: _exit(), tcflush() and all that (Re: Problem: shell prompt doesn't"
Reply: Ishikawa: "Re: _exit(), tcflush() and all that (Re: Problem: shell prompt doesn't"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> I did a quick search for the 1003.1g.
> It seems to be often quoted in the IPv6 socket extension work.
> I have not been able to read the relevant paragraph from
> the proposed draft yet.

Argh thud. Wrong thing you want the base 1003.1 standard. My fault.
1003.1 covers TIOC* behaviour. 1003.1g is networking and unrelated

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Dave Cinege: "Re: ramfs: mounting ramfs as / at boot time"
Previous message: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: FW: Kernel 2.4.0-test1 - compile problems with msr.c"
In reply to: Ishikawa: "Re: _exit(), tcflush() and all that (Re: Problem: shell prompt doesn't"
Next in thread: Ishikawa: "Re: _exit(), tcflush() and all that (Re: Problem: shell prompt doesn't"
Reply: Ishikawa: "Re: _exit(), tcflush() and all that (Re: Problem: shell prompt doesn't"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu May 25 2000 - 17:22:42 EDT