Re: Announcing CML2, a replacement for the kbuild system

From: Jonathan Walther (krooger@debian.org)
Date: Fri May 26 2000 - 20:32:31 EDT

  • Next message: Jens Axboe: "Re: 2.4.0-test1 bug"

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

    I agree; why CAN'T we configure the linux kernel more like we do the
    BSD ones? Their code and schema is very elegant and simple. And
    the source shouldn't be too hard to port over. David Parsons? Oh
    thats right, Linus ignores his patches. Oh well.

     --sig--
    It isn't true unless it makes you laugh, but you don't
    really understand it till it makes you cry.

    On Wed, 24 May 2000, Dominik Kubla wrote:
    > I really don't like the added complexity. IMHO we should ditch our current
    > config scheme in favour of the BSD tools if at all: They are written in
    > C, they are simple to use and they have a proven track record. What more
    > is there to ask?

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
    Version: 2.6.3ia
    Charset: noconv

    iQCVAwUBOS8XoMK9HT/YfGeBAQE9IQP/QhVL5NSrDp+8AYtGAFROsp+A/pm1fSDa
    pF03tUeffM+iudtUv3Z2rzalXqT6QyPUWgO6HKzsuED/5wfeSzfrUBWXW3O1STQd
    2x9XiglqA+6oHIG5jGuIOMWisuYrUMLWVtcb1x4Ar88z/AzK7zW//KnNXg8UzPiy
    3ZE+QwtiiDQ=
    =ruRy
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri May 26 2000 - 20:27:43 EDT