Re: Actual environment size comparison of CML1 and CML2

From: Alexander Viro (viro@math.psu.edu)
Date: Sat May 27 2000 - 04:31:35 EDT

  • Next message: Andrew Morton: "Re: kernel timer races"

    On Sat, 27 May 2000, Eric S. Raymond wrote:

    > Ghods, no. cmlconfigure is exactly the second Tcl/Tk program I have
    > written. I don't *like* Tcl/Tk, but I can live with it.
    >
    > Again, let's compare apples to apples. Maybe you want to throw away xconfig
    > entirely. Maybe *I* want to. It's not realistically possible.

    <innocent> ... and why is it impossible? Because of somebody who can't be
    arsed to keep the palm away from his... pointing device for several
    minutes but wants to configure the kernel?
    </innocent>

    OK, guys, let's get serious - provided that language will stay stable I'll
    do the C version. You've got a description of this beast and as long as
    you will remain compatible with it I don't see a problem.

    Getting more regular description of the config options _is_ a good thing,
    but let me repeat - in the long run fixing the underlying problems that make
    configuration complex is better than suiting the tools to that complexity.

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat May 27 2000 - 04:34:14 EDT