swap-space map bad. 2.2.15

From: Oleg Drokin (green@ccssu.crimea.ua)
Date: Sat May 27 2000 - 08:04:14 EDT

  • Next message: Alexander Viro: "Re: any chance we could dump the 64k subdirectory limit before 2.4 ships?"

    Hello!

    I got these on 2.2.15 patched with mingo's raid12345 patches.
    mordor:~$ dmesg | grep swap
    swap_duplicate at 100: entry 00000100, unused page
    swap_duplicate at 100: entry 00000100, unused page
    swap_free: swap-space map bad (entry 00000100)
    swap_duplicate at 100: entry 00000100, unused page
    swap_free: swap-space map bad (entry 00000100)
    swap_duplicate at 100: entry 00000100, unused page
    swap_free: swap-space map bad (entry 00000100)
    swap_duplicate at 100: entry 00000100, unused page
    swap_free: swap-space map bad (entry 00000100)
    swap_duplicate at 100: entry 00000100, unused page
    swap_free: swap-space map bad (entry 00000100)
    swap_duplicate at 100: entry 00000100, unused page
    swap_free: swap-space map bad (entry 00000100)
    swap_duplicate at 100: entry 00000100, unused page
    swap_free: swap-space map bad (entry 00000100)
    swap_duplicate at 100: entry 00000100, unused page
    swap_duplicate at 100: entry 00000100, unused page
    swap_free: swap-space map bad (entry 00000100)
    swap_duplicate at 100: entry 00000100, unused page
    swap_free: swap-space map bad (entry 00000100)

    I never have seen those before (though I use raid patches relatively long
    enough).
    If there is smth I can do to narrow problem, I'll do it (as long
    as there is no need to reject RAID usage)

    Bye,
        Oleg

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat May 27 2000 - 10:20:17 EDT