Re: LINUX Jobs for 2.4 update [scsi]

From: Jens Axboe (axboe@suse.de)
Date: Sat May 27 2000 - 17:07:27 EDT

  • Next message: Igmar Palsenberg: "Re: /dev/random -- can I enlarge the `randomness stock'?"

    On Sat, May 27 2000, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
    > > To Do
    > > -----
    > > Linux sends a 1K buffer with SCSI inquiries. The ANSI-SCSI limit is 255.
    >
    > I don't see how this can be. In scan_scsis() scsi_result0[256] is
    > declared, and if that isn't appropriate for host needing DMA then
    > we kmalloc(512, GFP_DMA) - either way it doesn't matter since the
    > allocation length field in the CCB for INQUIRY is only a byte (and
    > we set it to 255). Even scsi_wait_req() is told the the result buffer
    > length is 255 when the INQUIRY command is lodged.

    Exactly, I told Alan this several weeks ago also.

    > > Linux uses TEST_UNIT_READY to chck for device presence on a PUN/LUN. The
    > > INQUIRY is the only valid test allowed by the spec.
    >
    > The draft of SCSI-2 spec I have here hints that INQUIRY should be used
    > to probe system configuration and that TEST_UNIT_READY is more for
    > polling on devices with removable media. I tossed the TEST_UNIT_READY
    > part out and INQUIRY alone works fine (one disk, 2 CDs and a tape on
    > a BusLogic clone - all found as per usual).

    Looks good to me. Although I can't possibly see what harm a TEST_UNIT_READY
    command could do...

    -- 
    *  Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
    *  Linux CD/DVD-ROM, SuSE Labs
    *  http://kernel.dk
    

    - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat May 27 2000 - 17:24:36 EDT