Re: Syscall number allocation

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Sat Jun 03 2000 - 20:28:12 EDT

Next message: John Fulmer: "Abit KA7 PCI problems?"

Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: How to sleep a kernel thread?"
In reply to: Josh Huber: "Syscall number allocation"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> I'm told that Linus is somewhat anti debugging systems in the kernel, so it
> seems like the only route to make using our system and painless as possible
> would be to have system call entries marked as unimplemented, which would be
> filled in when you apply our patch.

Why does it need to be a syscall ?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: John Fulmer: "Abit KA7 PCI problems?"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: How to sleep a kernel thread?"
In reply to: Josh Huber: "Syscall number allocation"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jun 03 2000 - 20:41:06 EDT