Re: ULTRA ATA/100 announced

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Mon Jun 05 2000 - 19:42:23 EDT

Next message: Keith Owens: "Re: TODO List / State of CML2"

Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: (reiserfs) Re: New Linux 2.5 - 2.6 TODO (Alan Cox suggestsdelaying"
In reply to: Bryan -TheBS- Smith: "Re: ULTRA ATA/100 announced"
Next in thread: Andre Hedrick: "Re: ULTRA ATA/100 announced"
Next in thread: Andre Hedrick: "Re: ULTRA ATA/100 announced"
Next in thread: Gérard Roudier: "Re: ULTRA ATA/100 announced"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> If "sector remapping" became a feature in ATA, it would look mighty

ATA disks have done automatic bad sector remapping for years, and SMART.

SCSI won a long time ago. ATAPI is SCSI messages over the IDE bus. USB
block devices are SCSI messages over USB bus. Fibrechannel uses SCSI messages
and I believe even IEEE1394 does

Alan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Keith Owens: "Re: TODO List / State of CML2"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: (reiserfs) Re: New Linux 2.5 - 2.6 TODO (Alan Cox suggestsdelaying"
In reply to: Bryan -TheBS- Smith: "Re: ULTRA ATA/100 announced"
Next in thread: Andre Hedrick: "Re: ULTRA ATA/100 announced"
Next in thread: Andre Hedrick: "Re: ULTRA ATA/100 announced"
Next in thread: Gérard Roudier: "Re: ULTRA ATA/100 announced"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jun 05 2000 - 23:23:25 EDT